Strong Signals / Issue 01 / November 2026
Every PRC-029-2 study hit the same ten problems. Plus SPP's model manual, a CIGRE result that should worry you, and 3,800 MW that left the grid.
GridStrong logged every model issue that slowed down a PRC-029-2 ride-through assessment, in PSS/E and in PSCAD, across a portfolio of plants. The issues fell into ten families. Plant data that conflicted or was missing caused 31% of them, three times the next family, and it turned up on 100% of projects.
Sound familiar? Email us at newsletter@news.gridstrong.ai and tell us which of the ten you have hit.
Lessons from a portfolio of PSS/E and PSCAD assessments, by Mehdi Rezvani, Principal Engineer, Power Systems Studies
The article covers how each family was resolved, how to keep PSS/E and PSCAD aligned, what it means for Category 2 plants, and fourteen practical suggestions for the next study.
SPP planners will now get models that are validated, benchmarked and consistent across tools, in line with FERC Order No. 901 and IEEE 2800-2022. For interconnection customers it is a new bar, and it is already here. Every model package now has to:
It is not only the next queue. Any Surplus, Replacement, Modification, Interim Availability or Affected System request submitted on or after October 26, 2026 falls under the manual today.
See how SPP compares with the other RTOs
GridStrong's SPP Model Quality Tests module
Pass, trip, pass. The plant did not change and neither did its settings; only the way the test was applied did. Iman Kaffashan presented GridStrong's comparative assessment of voltage ride-through test profiles in PRC-029-2 at the CIGRE Energy Forum 2026 in Calgary. Using EMT simulation of a 200 MW wind plant, the team compared three ways of applying the PRC-029-2 voltage profile:
The test methodology can decide the compliance result. The paper calls for a clearer profile definition in PRC-029, or guidance coordinated with IEEE 2800-2022.
Co-authors: Poria Astero (GridStrong), Maryam Torabi and Sifat Amin (PSC Consulting). All GridStrong talks and papers
Northern Virginia lost about 1,500 MW of data center load in 2024 and about 3,800 MW in 2026, and every piece of equipment did exactly what it was set to do. ERCOT counted 26 of these events between 2023 and 2025. Tom Scaramellino moderated the large-load panel at the SMA Grid Integration Summit 2026 with Todd Hillman (MISO) and Erik Ela (ESIG): why the inverter-based resource playbook does not transfer cleanly to load, the two regulatory tracks converging on the same facility, and where each region stands.
GridStrong for data centers and large loads
Two sessions on Wednesday, November 18, both at the Las Vegas Convention Center.
The new gridstrong.ai is live. The Standards Help Center takes each NERC, ERCOT and MISO requirement for inverter-based resources one at a time: who it applies to, the dates, what the requirement says, the evidence an auditor expects, and a free template procedure. Next to it, a Compliance Calendar of every effective and compliance date that matters, and Client Guidance, short engineer-written briefs on the rules clients ask about most, free, no sign-up.
Standards Help Center · Compliance Calendar · Client Guidance
A NERC PRC-028-1 disturbance monitoring assessment for one plant, at no cost and with no obligation. Sign the NDA, send every file you have for the plant, and the initial results are in the Dashboard within 72 hours; the signed, engineer-reviewed assessment follows in under a week.
Plant data, OEM models, a validated MOD-026-2 model that failed the fault, the point of measurement? Email us at newsletter@news.gridstrong.ai and tell us which of the ten families hit you. We read every reply, and the answers shape the next issue.
Strong Signals goes out once a month to the people who run compliance, modeling and interconnection. Ask to be on the list, or bring a question from this issue to a GridStrong engineer.