Task and project tracking
Every recommendation in more than 50 study reports became an assigned, dated task on the owner's dashboard in two days. Re-runs keep the program current, so the spreadsheet never gets made.
The owner from the fleet gap analysis had several dozen plants with findings from ride-through, disturbance-monitoring and grid-code studies, each with its own list of fixes, owners and deadlines. The lists lived in the reports and in a roadmap spreadsheet. The task list in the dashboard had grown to about 1,900 items, most of them stale leftovers from earlier tools and templates. Nobody could see the program as a whole.
An implementation program needs every fix as a task with an owner, a start date, an end date and the external deadline from the standard, grouped so the owner can see a plant, a manufacturer or the whole fleet at once. And it has to stay current without anyone hand-editing a list.
We built the program directly from the delivered work. Each study report's recommendations became subtasks under one parent task per plant per standard, word for word. Dates came from the owner's roadmap and its contractor's schedule, with external deadlines set from the standards. Each task was assigned to the plant's site manager, with an engineer as reviewer and the compliance lead and regional manager watching. Grouped by equipment manufacturer, the tasks formed nine projects with a timeline view.
From the request to the tasks being live on the owner's dashboard took about two days: about 300 tasks and nine projects. Three days later about 1,400 stale tasks were cleared in one pass.
A task list of about 1,900 items became about 650 live tasks, half of them the implementation program and the rest the owner's current work. When a report changes, the build re-runs: it updates what moved and never deletes.
The owner's team opens a project and sees every plant's fixes, who owns each one and when it is due. Their staff mark work done. They do not maintain a list.
Compliance programs fail in the gap between a report and a to-do list. Closing that gap by hand means someone retyping hundreds of items and keeping a spreadsheet alive. Here the report is the source and the record is the dashboard.
At a glance
Related
Talk to an engineer